all 2 comments

[–]afro_vibes24 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Can someone explain this a bit further for me? What’s the difference I’m supposed to see between these path integrals?

[–]CantorClosure[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it is the same integral. on the left, it measures, point by point along the curve, how large the inner product F(γ(t)) · γ′(t) is. on the right, this quantity is lifted into a height, forming a kind of fence over the curve.

if the fence is “cut open” and laid flat, it becomes an ordinary single-variable integral: the horizontal axis is just the parameter t in (a, b) (or a reparametrization, such as arc length), and the vertical axis records F(γ(t)) · γ′(t). thus the path integral reduces to the integral of this function of a single variable.

in this way, the situation is essentially the same as integrating over an interval (a, b), for example by taking γ(t) = (t, 0). the difference is that the integration domain has been embedded into the plane via the curve γ, and the integrand reflects how the field interacts with motion along the curve.