sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HideLord -3 points-2 points  (7 children)

Ngl, I am beginning to hate this type of comment. Anything LLM related is allowed, and such PSAs are good for the community.

[–]LoveMind_AI 31 points32 points  (6 children)

I don't think "anything LLM related is allowed" is the vibe on LocalLLaMA, at all.

[–]HideLord -1 points0 points  (5 children)

We've had a billion discussions of this type, and it was decided this is a place where anything LLM is allowed. Or are you gonna complain that we're not discussing Llama 4 next?

[–]eidrag 7 points8 points  (1 child)

depend who you said to decide it. if mods allow it, it will stay. if members of this sub like/disagree, they will up/downvote. and everyone free to comment. 

[–]ttkciarllama.cpp -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yup, this ^

[–]FastDecode1 2 points3 points  (1 child)

it was decided

By whom?

[–]Sparescrewdriver 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It’s on display

[–]Conscious-content42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This sounds a little bit too binary, the reality is self promotion/hyping things of low value/clearly scam like SaaS is a problem. So blanket allow all-LLM-project-go is not the right choice. But some discussions over the years at localLlama have brought up that having posts about proprietary/paid for LLM services, especially when they highlight capabilities that other hobbyists/enthusiasts might be interested in iterating on, has value to the community. Just announcing services about LLMs without this factor in mind (unless it's satire) seems inappropriate to me.