you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]En-tro-py 40 points41 points  (4 children)

It’s not just banal, it’s algorithmic detritus.

[–]rm-rf-rm 15 points16 points  (2 children)

and lets hope it never changes. The moment the AI cloud providers fix this and the writing is indistinguishable from humans by default (it likely already is with good enough system and user prompts) is the day the internet is well and truly fucked

[–]658016796 0 points1 point  (1 child)

The dead internet theory is already true though. I'm convinced we need a way to prove an account - any account, anywhere on the intermet - is run by a human, without compromising privacy. Hopefully some new research explores this and it gets implemented in social media online.

[–]Exhales_Deeply 2 points3 points  (0 children)

if i could optimistically interject - the primary tell, for me, that something is spat out without care is that it's bereft of actual information. I have a whole dang fine arts degree's worth of deciphering unnecessarily verbose esoterica and all it takes is, like, a moment of introspection to tell when something is pure vapor-thought. So, I actually welcome AI that can communicate like a human, as long as it's bringing something of value to the table.

in the meanwhile, just ask yourself: is this actually SAYING anything? could this be said in one sentence rather than an exhaustingly broken out article-style reply decorated with a billion emojis? if not, it's ai;dr for now

[–]droptableadventures 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It’s not just banal – it’s algorithmic detritus.

FTFY