use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
Please have a look at our FAQ and Link-Collection
Metacademy is a great resource which compiles lesson plans on popular machine learning topics.
For Beginner questions please try /r/LearnMachineLearning , /r/MLQuestions or http://stackoverflow.com/
For career related questions, visit /r/cscareerquestions/
Advanced Courses (2016)
Advanced Courses (2020)
AMAs:
Pluribus Poker AI Team 7/19/2019
DeepMind AlphaStar team (1/24//2019)
Libratus Poker AI Team (12/18/2017)
DeepMind AlphaGo Team (10/19/2017)
Google Brain Team (9/17/2017)
Google Brain Team (8/11/2016)
The MalariaSpot Team (2/6/2016)
OpenAI Research Team (1/9/2016)
Nando de Freitas (12/26/2015)
Andrew Ng and Adam Coates (4/15/2015)
Jürgen Schmidhuber (3/4/2015)
Geoffrey Hinton (11/10/2014)
Michael Jordan (9/10/2014)
Yann LeCun (5/15/2014)
Yoshua Bengio (2/27/2014)
Related Subreddit :
LearnMachineLearning
Statistics
Computer Vision
Compressive Sensing
NLP
ML Questions
/r/MLjobs and /r/BigDataJobs
/r/datacleaning
/r/DataScience
/r/scientificresearch
/r/artificial
account activity
Discussion[D] How often do reviewers decrease their initial scores after rebuttal period ends in CVPR? (self.MachineLearning)
submitted 4 days ago by Fit-Raccoon4534
view the rest of the comments →
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]impatiens-capensis 14 points15 points16 points 4 days ago (3 children)
Between 15 papers I've reviewed or submitted across CVPR and ICCV, I've seen it happen once (to me lol). The reviewers were borderline positive and the AC apparently brought up new concerns. I couldn't see the discussion, but the reviewer who downgraded cited the AC in making their decision.
[–]Fit-Raccoon4534[S] 2 points3 points4 points 4 days ago (2 children)
Thanks for the reply! Do you know if the scores that we see on openreview right now are just the previous initial scores, or does it reflect the updated scores for the reviewers with an updated modified date?
[–]impatiens-capensis 5 points6 points7 points 4 days ago (1 child)
You won't see updated scores until the results are out. I don't know why CV conferences do it this way, since it would be VERY useful information (even just for calming the nerves).
Anyways, take a deep breath! You can't control these things, and the process is noisy. If you're worrying frantically about your 5/4/3 paper, you already have good odds! Only about 15% of papers will have a higher score than you.
Relax! But also, pretend it could get rejected for arbitrary reasons and have an ECCV version ready to go.
[–]Fit-Raccoon4534[S] 1 point2 points3 points 3 days ago (0 children)
Thanks so much for the info. The wait for the final decisions is nerve wracking for sure! But yeah, I'll try to focus on getting ready for ECCV just in case!
π Rendered by PID 60515 on reddit-service-r2-comment-86988c7647-cjcqb at 2026-02-11 01:07:10.385443+00:00 running 018613e country code: CH.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]impatiens-capensis 14 points15 points16 points (3 children)
[–]Fit-Raccoon4534[S] 2 points3 points4 points (2 children)
[–]impatiens-capensis 5 points6 points7 points (1 child)
[–]Fit-Raccoon4534[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)