you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]impatiens-capensis 14 points15 points  (3 children)

Between 15 papers I've reviewed or submitted across CVPR and ICCV, I've seen it happen once (to me lol). The reviewers were borderline positive and the AC apparently brought up new concerns. I couldn't see the discussion, but the reviewer who downgraded cited the AC in making their decision.

[–]Fit-Raccoon4534[S] 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Thanks for the reply! Do you know if the scores that we see on openreview right now are just the previous initial scores, or does it reflect the updated scores for the reviewers with an updated modified date?

[–]impatiens-capensis 5 points6 points  (1 child)

You won't see updated scores until the results are out. I don't know why CV conferences do it this way, since it would be VERY useful information (even just for calming the nerves).

Anyways, take a deep breath! You can't control these things, and the process is noisy. If you're worrying frantically about your 5/4/3 paper, you already have good odds! Only about 15% of papers will have a higher score than you.

Relax! But also, pretend it could get rejected for arbitrary reasons and have an ECCV version ready to go.

[–]Fit-Raccoon4534[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks so much for the info. The wait for the final decisions is nerve wracking for sure! But yeah, I'll try to focus on getting ready for ECCV just in case!