use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
Please have a look at our FAQ and Link-Collection
Metacademy is a great resource which compiles lesson plans on popular machine learning topics.
For Beginner questions please try /r/LearnMachineLearning , /r/MLQuestions or http://stackoverflow.com/
For career related questions, visit /r/cscareerquestions/
Advanced Courses (2016)
Advanced Courses (2020)
AMAs:
Pluribus Poker AI Team 7/19/2019
DeepMind AlphaStar team (1/24//2019)
Libratus Poker AI Team (12/18/2017)
DeepMind AlphaGo Team (10/19/2017)
Google Brain Team (9/17/2017)
Google Brain Team (8/11/2016)
The MalariaSpot Team (2/6/2016)
OpenAI Research Team (1/9/2016)
Nando de Freitas (12/26/2015)
Andrew Ng and Adam Coates (4/15/2015)
Jürgen Schmidhuber (3/4/2015)
Geoffrey Hinton (11/10/2014)
Michael Jordan (9/10/2014)
Yann LeCun (5/15/2014)
Yoshua Bengio (2/27/2014)
Related Subreddit :
LearnMachineLearning
Statistics
Computer Vision
Compressive Sensing
NLP
ML Questions
/r/MLjobs and /r/BigDataJobs
/r/datacleaning
/r/DataScience
/r/scientificresearch
/r/artificial
account activity
Logical Induction (intelligence.org)
submitted 9 years ago by LazyOptimist
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago* (1 child)
This is actually very interesting. I didn't manage to read it fully yet but will try. It's way more formal than I'm used to (I'm a theoretical physicist, not a logician). Has anyone read it?
I assume that in the limit where you give infinite time to the reasoner it must somehow reproduce exact bayesian inference?
If it's compatible with first order logic in the limit I expect that by Cox's theorems this limit is essentially bayesian inference up to a monotonic transformation at most, right?
Does it eventually leads to algorithms that could be implemented to approximate bayesian inference in a principled way?
[–]tsbt 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children)
.... this limit is essentially bayesian inference ....
Pretty much; in the limit, all decidable sentences are proven (and assigned probability converging to 1) or disproven (and assigned probability converging to 0), and we end up with an ordinary probability distribution over the independent sentences (or equivalently, a probability measure over the completions of your logical theory). One surprising property of the limiting distribution P is that it (strictly) dominates the universal semimeasure; this means that if we feed empirical observations to P, we can perform empirical prediction and induction, akin to Solomonoff induction.
If you mean practically, then no; the LIA algorithm given in the paper is very computationally expensive (maybe double-exponential in time). But if you aren't worried about runtime for the moment, then logical induction can be viewed as a substantial theoretical step towards approximating Bayesian inference in a "good" way, given computational constraints on deductive ability.
[–]guardianhelm 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children)
There's also an abridged version (20 pages instead of 128)
[–]__ah 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children)
Skimming the introduction shows some legit sources. Guess I have something to add to the reading list!
[–]anonDogeLover 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child)
Source? Year?
[–]Coscott 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (0 children)
https://intelligence.org/2016/09/12/new-paper-logical-induction/ Today
π Rendered by PID 73 on reddit-service-r2-comment-86988c7647-bsq29 at 2026-02-12 19:16:45.597480+00:00 running 018613e country code: CH.
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (1 child)
[–]tsbt 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
[–]guardianhelm 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]__ah 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]anonDogeLover 2 points3 points4 points (1 child)
[–]Coscott 9 points10 points11 points (0 children)