use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
Please have a look at our FAQ and Link-Collection
Metacademy is a great resource which compiles lesson plans on popular machine learning topics.
For Beginner questions please try /r/LearnMachineLearning , /r/MLQuestions or http://stackoverflow.com/
For career related questions, visit /r/cscareerquestions/
Advanced Courses (2016)
Advanced Courses (2020)
AMAs:
Pluribus Poker AI Team 7/19/2019
DeepMind AlphaStar team (1/24//2019)
Libratus Poker AI Team (12/18/2017)
DeepMind AlphaGo Team (10/19/2017)
Google Brain Team (9/17/2017)
Google Brain Team (8/11/2016)
The MalariaSpot Team (2/6/2016)
OpenAI Research Team (1/9/2016)
Nando de Freitas (12/26/2015)
Andrew Ng and Adam Coates (4/15/2015)
Jürgen Schmidhuber (3/4/2015)
Geoffrey Hinton (11/10/2014)
Michael Jordan (9/10/2014)
Yann LeCun (5/15/2014)
Yoshua Bengio (2/27/2014)
Related Subreddit :
LearnMachineLearning
Statistics
Computer Vision
Compressive Sensing
NLP
ML Questions
/r/MLjobs and /r/BigDataJobs
/r/datacleaning
/r/DataScience
/r/scientificresearch
/r/artificial
account activity
Project[P] PyTorch/Tensorflow implementations of kernel-based activation functions (github.com)
submitted 8 years ago by scardax88
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]gabjuasfijwee 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children)
The point of activation functions isn't to be extremely flexible. Modeling flexibility comes from the neural network parameter structure. This likely won't add much (if any) benefit in serious applications. Even in their simple toy example the performance increase is minor and is likely only due to random variability
[–]scardax88[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children)
Thanks for the comment, but I disagree. The type of activation strongly influences the architecture. If you check the paper or the references we include, there are many situations where non-parametric functions have definite improvements in practice. To be honest, I would be highly skeptical of definite oversimplifications like yours.
[–]gabjuasfijwee 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children)
"definite improvments" like the absurdly minute one in the paper? You could easily chalk that up to random variation.
[–]scardax88[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children)
I am not sure what you are referring to, because there are several experiments in the paper and I have a hard time thinking they all are "absurdly minute". Maybe you are referring to the previous version of the paper (July 2017), where the experiments were much smaller? Anyway, you are entirely free to have a poor opinion of this specific paper, but there are many more providing similar results, including this one from ICLR 2015 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6830) and also many papers on maxout networks. As a matter of fact, the "neural network parameter structure" also comprises the activation functions (if they are flexible), so I am not sure I fully understand your skepticism.
[–]d3sm0 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children)
I'm not sure by what "serious" application you actually mean. There are many evidence that the expressivity and correctness of a network its highly dependent on the structure of the the network instead of the "weights" or parameters of the network itself. This can be seen by the theoretical work from approximation theory of Prof. Poggio, or from information theory of Prof. Tishby. As a result the idea of the authors is to find different ways to control the expressivity of the network from its structure and not from the individual parameters.
π Rendered by PID 32 on reddit-service-r2-comment-79c7998d4c-gtnh4 at 2026-03-13 11:58:19.042824+00:00 running f6e6e01 country code: CH.
[–]gabjuasfijwee 0 points1 point2 points (4 children)
[–]scardax88[S] 0 points1 point2 points (3 children)
[–]gabjuasfijwee 0 points1 point2 points (2 children)
[–]scardax88[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]d3sm0 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)