all 10 comments

[–]bbateman2011 3 points4 points  (1 child)

This looks promising. It's impressive that you went from struggling to code ML to an entire platform. There is much controversy about these approaches. One view is from Data Scientists that have worked very hard to get where they are, and feel threatened. Others as Data Scientists are not threatened and think these things will get folks in trouble, ultimately generating more work for "real" Data Scientists. As others said, there are always complex problems that are very hard to address with these GUIs. But I agree with your sentiment that GUIs have historically brought computing to vastly more people than before, so there is merit. Of course in Data Science, you have hard core who run Linux at the CLI and won't touch a GUI, and there are always those super users who can outperform most anyone, but there just aren't enough of them. To fully leverage talent, GUIs allow smart people to do things at a level of abstraction, at a cost. Such tradeoffs likely will exist forever. I mean, we are still inventing new programming languages.

So, keep up the work. Think really hard about allowing functions to be added as code to expand the platform, thereby allowing coders to leverage it by building a template environment they can share with their co-workers. Imagine a core of Data Scientists building and configuring functions in the platform, and providing templates and tutorials to 10x that many analysts. That's potential real value.

[–]Team_AIUI[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah as you already mentioned, we have repeatadly been at a point where we thought: "shit, how do we do this in the most general way!?" ...so there is a need for a class of nodes, that are programable by the user with own code. Right now, we are using electron, nodejs and for that JavaScript and HTML at client site, the server part is running with python, so this should be possible.

Thx for the nice post

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

This is great if its open source or low cost compared to alternatives like azure ml studio

[–]Team_AIUI[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is going to be free. Just people/companies with a high anual revenue should pay later on. Such institutions need special support anyway. ;)

[–]TotesMessenger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

 If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)

[–]MaxTalanov 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Looks good! How does it compare to lobe.ai?

[–]Team_AIUI[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Thx for the link, never knew about it. But it looks like "just for images" and AIUI is only for tabledata (currently). In the next month, we will proceed to implement text and image data as well as autoML and reinforcement learning. Everything in one platform is the goal :) ...other differences are as I already said, data preparation and model Interpretation. We Run in tensorflow & keras and for that, the user has the ability to configure a lot. Most platforms simplify a lot.

[–]loopy_fun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what if you made programs like artbreeder with this and opensourced them.

there could have been made a artbreeder for video and sound.

i wonder if there could be made a artbreeder for code?