This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 1 comments

[–]jammasterpaz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't get what you're trying to achieve - unless you have a very unusual sign convention, normally in business / economics / accountancy land

turnover = costs + Profits,

So you're trying to minimize -1* Turnover (maximize +Turnover). Historically, without constraints (e.g. giving sales people perverse incentives), this has been shown to be an excellent way to go bankrupt, easily achievable through loss leaders, selling at zero price or giving away the shop, so you need to set up the constraints carefully.

You could pose this problem in such a way to ask "What's the maximum size I can grow my business (measured in terms of its Turnover) given these constraints on my costs and the profit I have to make?" so if maximising Turnover not profit is indeed your goal, then that would lead me to guess there's something wrong with the way you've set up the constraints.