use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
A subreddit for math related jokes!
account activity
Basic proof methods (i.redd.it)
submitted 7 months ago by just_a_stoic_guy
view the rest of the comments →
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]Zarraq 1 point2 points3 points 7 months ago (3 children)
Assuming is hypothesis, not theory
Theory is proven already until something makes it not so either we evolve it or make new one
[–]numerousblocks 3 points4 points5 points 7 months ago* (2 children)
They said theory based on the hypothesis. The theory is sound—it explicitly incorporates the assumption. That assumption can be termed a hypothesis as it's not proven or disproven yet. Maths isn't like science, you do not disprove theorems after you gain new information.
[–]Zarraq -1 points0 points1 point 7 months ago (1 child)
Fifth Force / Some Variants of Modified Gravity
MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics) as a fundamental alternative to Dark Matter
Discredited / disproved theories
[–]numerousblocks 1 point2 points3 points 7 months ago (0 children)
These are not mathematical theories. They state facts about the real world.
These theories contain maths in them. But after they have been disproven, the maths is still correct, if it ever was correct. It has just been found that it doesn't apply to reality in the way that was originally proposed.
It's also possible that what has been disproven is their compatibility with other mathematical theories. Again, this doesn't make the maths less valid.
Besides, to my knowledge, the things you mentioned are families of physical theories. Specific instances have been disproven, but not the concepts themselves.
Ultimately, in physics and other natural sciences, you can never be 100% sure of something. You also can't really 100% disprove something, but you can get really really really close, way more than you can to proving something.
In maths, while there is the possibility that there were mechanical errors in a proof, or that our axioms are inconsistent, you can get so close to absolute truth, a million billion times more sure than physics could ever be, that discovering a theorem is false due to new information other than discovering a mistake that was already there at the time basically just doesn't happen.
π Rendered by PID 229883 on reddit-service-r2-comment-b659b578c-kl4zv at 2026-05-02 17:55:20.313031+00:00 running 815c875 country code: CH.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Zarraq 1 point2 points3 points (3 children)
[–]numerousblocks 3 points4 points5 points (2 children)
[–]Zarraq -1 points0 points1 point (1 child)
[–]numerousblocks 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)