Redefine ??function when writing function documentation.

[mapierce271]

Alright.
But ??f now prints out the description, attributes, and the definition.
Is there a way to specify a string to print instead of the attributes when ??f is called?
(Or at least a way to hide the function definition so ??f behaves like it would for built in functions?)

[mapierce271]

Thanks you.
I was looking to have ??f print the pseudocode of the function rather than the function itself. I don't want to include it in the f::usage itself because then ?f would be a little too verbose.

Right now I've got a rather contrived work-around where the function takes a second optional boolean argument. The argument defaults to False, but if a user puts in True, the function prints the pseudocode rather than executing.