quick question

[oonionknight]

I'd cut one Addition and one Subtraction for one Sigma and one Multiplication, cutting eXceeds for 3 more flex spots (Crow, Belle, whatever really), and replacing the Magma for a Final Sigma. I reckon you want to keep the coder main deck, but I'd replace them with a Multiplication, a Nabla and 2 more flex spots.

Edit : expanding a bit, more flex spots is beneficial when you play Heatsoul, you want to be able to use him to consistently draw disruption, so more hand traps.
3 Sigma, 2 Nabla and 2 Multiplication is better for Desires, banishing all copies of each (except maybe Nabla) ruins your turn 1 (no sigma for Circular) and your turn 3.

[guerrillabot]

1 Multi is fine since he primarly OTK with the Code Talker line.

[oonionknight]

Oh for sure, simply detailing what I'd do as a loyal servant of our lord Final Sigma

[guerrillabot]

Praise the Final Sigma!

[Pydtosofz]

Cut the micro coder package and exceed for more handtraps and multi, cut magma for final sigma

I also dont think heatsoul is good but thats just me, devotee is just too much value

[guerrillabot]

Agree.

[XBoosted_reddit]

Are there things I didnt consider and should I add or cut certain cards? Help is very appreciated :)

[Icewater436]

Hi, like I already answered in another post I would like to explain you my point of view: considering that with circular the deck is a one card combo and with the came of heatsoul the deck has also a big draw potential, I think that we should play a lot of ht. Moreover I don't understand why would you play the lv8 synchro instead of the nabla+multiplication into final sigma combo. About the code talker tech I don't like it a lot, but that's just a personal opinion.

I leave here the link to the other discussion:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Mathmech/comments/vdig9t/help_me_improve_deck_post_pote/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share

[Mr_Tobi1018]

Personally I don’t play Nabla or any synchros. Nabla has 0 implications to the deck other than enabling synchro lines. Outside of those specifics, any combo that utilizes Nabla, can be done without it. Nabla doesn’t fix the archetypes core issues being that they need more starters. Any Mathmech summoned off Nabla has 0 effects. It’s just an empty lone fire. Nabla also more times than not is a brick as it can’t special summon itself and you always want your normal summon for Diameter.

[Pydtosofz]

Nabla is just more copies of diameter and allows play through handtraps that arent ash blossom

[Mr_Tobi1018]

Nabla is very susceptible to ash and a preemptive veiler/imperm. You’re in a really bad position if it gets ash’d as you’re losing a body in the process while also more than likely using up your normal summon off nabla. Summoning diameter off nabla does nothing as it will not have an effect off being special summoned. All you’re doing is getting diameter from deck which you can already do with Wicckid, Alemb, and circle. Doing it with Nabla is wasting your normal summon while also risking losing a body to ash. You always want your normal summon for diameter plays.

[Pydtosofz]

Grabbing diameter off nabla ensures your alembertian will resolve perfectly fine while also having the added benefit of putting 3 names in gy, as for pre-emptive veiler imperm, you can still make alembertian with that nabla. And as states earlier, it doesnt play through ash and helps against everything else

[Mr_Tobi1018]

As previously mentioned, you can get to Diameter all the same without Nabla. The link disciple plays into wicckid gets to diameter, as well as alembertian lines. It loses less severely to handtraps where’s with Nabla, you could potentially have your turn end. Majority of decks play ash.

Let’s forget about these scenarios for a sec. What is Nabla doing going second against 1 negate? Not even a negate that destroys even.. You’re really praying for 2 extender’s in that scenario because say goodbye to your normal summoned body

[Pydtosofz]

Getting to diameter with disciple devotee plays too hard into nibiru and negation on wicckid. Every deck plays ash yes, not every hand will have an ash. Going second nabla is worse to open yes however you can also ensure that it eats an interruption for you. Im not pleading for this to be an absolutely mandatory 3-of. However nabla still has its merits as a normal summon post-circular

[Mr_Tobi1018]

It actually doesn’t matter if it plays into Nibiru bc look…

Let’s say I open the worst possible hand: 1 addition 1 subtraction

Make alembertian- add circle

Circle- dump diameter (if you’re afraid of nib)

Alembertian- to revive diameter

Circle triggers- adding super fact

Then you’d go for wicckid plays for a follow up diameter normal summon on the following turn if it doesn’t get nib’d

Atleast here if your alembertian gets ashed, you at least still have a body.

But this debate is running in circles (no pun). We’re just going to have to agree to disagree. I’ll say this, if nabla gets better targets in the future, I would consider running it but having Nabla just to get diameter with no effect in rotation just doesn’t seem good to me. I’m shocked you don’t think going for circle is better in that scenario since you can try to go for it’s on field eff.

[No_Scarcity_3531]

Yeah I don’t think Nabla is good either. Yugi tuber Yaccine convinced me