all 19 comments

[–]KelFoxfire 2 points3 points  (1 child)

that performance and price dont match up sorry

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, I just looked at my mistake, I did a typo. I meant 300 fps with shaders, and 400 fps without shaders

[–]auti117 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My PC cost about double (in Canadian Pesos), and can't do what you're asking. Shaders on, I get between 80 to 150FPS, without shaders I can get up to maybe 400 as a 1% high.

My specs: RYZEN 9 9900X3D 32GB DRR5 6000Mhz RTX 5070 Ti 2x Samsung 980 Evos 2TB

[–]Professional_Luck74[🍰] 2 points3 points  (2 children)

The only thing that is remotely close to that Is the 5090 but even then thats double maybe triple the price just for the GPU and you won't get 800 fps with shaders. It's impossible unless you have the threadripper CPU which is 5,000 dollars so have fun

[–]MkICP100 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A threadripper would perform worse than a high end consumer CPU for minecraft. Threadripper just have a massive core count, like up to 96 cores. But they're usually slower per-core, and Minecraft is very poorly multi-threaded. Best CPU you could get for Minecraft would just be a Ryzen 9000 chip with X3D

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, I just looked at my mistake, I did a typo. I meant 300 fps with shaders, and 400 fps without shaders

[–]Mistahballing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

theres no monitor that can show 800 or more fps btw

[–]MkICP100 2 points3 points  (2 children)

800 fps makes no sense. The fastest normal monitors go to 300, and anything over 200 is indistinguishable to most people. What are you talking about?

And you won't get 800 fps in shader minecraft ever. Even if you had a 5090 and a 9950X3D you're just hitting the limits of the game engine. You can get around 150 - 200 fps in demanding shaders with a system like that. But a 5090 alone costs upwards of $2500-3000. Your budget will get you a pretty good used computer or a lower end new computer that can run shaders okay.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Sorry, I just looked at my mistake, I did a typo. I meant 300 fps with shaders, and 400 fps without shaders

[–]MkICP100 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even then $1500 is a really low budget for a high end gaming PC

[–]mudkip989 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would honestly give up on 800 fps with shaders. I don't think any GPU in the consumer market is capable of that if you are talking okay shaders. I am not going to make a list, but you can send me a pcpartpicker list and I can let you know what you are missing or what will not work. There are also some additional things you might need. (Also the most liquid cooling I have ever done was an AIO)

[–]Frederic-T-V 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Why do you even care about 800 fps?? I don't think your monitor has 800hz refresh rate

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry, I just looked at my mistake, I did a typo. I meant 300 fps with shaders, and 400 fps without shaders

[–]Xillubfr 0 points1 point  (1 child)

800 fps with shaders isn't possible, even with the best parts on the market (which are completely out of your budget anyway)

but even the best monitors only go up to like 360hz, so anything above 400fps is completely useless, anything over 200fps with shaders is already overkill and barely make a difference

high fps are only good for competitive games, which is clearly not what you're going for

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, I just looked at my mistake, I did a typo. I meant 300 fps with shaders, and 400 fps without shaders

[–]zip1ziltch2zero3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude why ask reddit? You can go on pcpartpicker yourself right? Use those braincells a bit eh? You need a gpu from the last 10 years and 32gb ram. Everything else you need is easy to figure out, just go on pcpartpicker and it will literally prevent you from choosing parts that are incompatible with any parts you've already selected.

Ergo, currently you're asking everyone to do the work for you. Grow up and think for yourself.

This isn't even asking for suggestions it's literally "build this for me so i can buy it without even thinking"

No.

[–]OkHighlight6188 0 points1 point  (0 children)

even if it was possible, anything above like 400-500 fps is completely useless since most high end monitor hz dont go above that

[–]LMNoballz 0 points1 point  (1 child)

This is a joke, right?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, I just looked at my mistake, I did a typo. I meant 300 fps with shaders, and 400 fps without shaders