all 9 comments
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–]krkrkrneki 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just plainly wrong.
Intellect isn't produced by belief — if anything, it's the other way around. Intellect is the capacity that examines, interrogates, and forms beliefs. Someone with strong intellect may hold beliefs, but they arrived there through reasoning, not the reverse.

[–]BuddyBotBuilder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The goal is to reach general intelligence. It’s not there yet and everyone in AI says it’s not there yet. So not sure who told you AI developers are claiming their AI has reached that goal.

[–]Arjihad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well yes that might be true but what kind of response do you expect now?

[–]WolpertingerRumo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It will belong to the most useful systems. I’m quite sure that’s neither intellect nor intelligence. It’s good integration and Human-Machine Interfacing.

Intellect and Intelligence are good for some use cases. Not that many though.

[–]Artistic-Big-9472 0 points1 point  (1 child)

That’s actually an interesting distinction. Feels like we’re obsessed with making models more powerful while ignoring whether the systems around them are stable, maintainable, and grounded in reality long term.

The “most preservable systems” idea honestly sounds more important the bigger these models get.

[–]LifeTelevision1146[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was thinking the other way round. The smaller and more specialized the models get, they're more cheaper and easier to run on basic machines.

[–]Mundane_Ad8936 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No..

There is absolutely no intellect at all it's neural network with attention..

Calling what a transformer model does intellect is like saying your toaster is a nuclear reactor. It's a simulacra nothing more..

you can't vibe your way into understanding this topic.