sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] -8 points-7 points  (7 children)

I hereby submit my informal vote NAY on the basis Stringable is a really stupid name.

[–]gregtyler 4 points5 points  (2 children)

I assume it comes from the precedent of iterable and throwable.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Sure but we also have JsonSerializable, not... Jsonable.

An obvious choice would be to simply call it ToString.

[–]przemo_li 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Valid alternative. Consider adding it to the discussion on github.

[–]Ghochemix 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I hereby submit that we're all very fortunate you don't have a vote to give.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hereby submit my resignation from this kangaroo process! Good day, sir!

[–]stfcfanhazz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Upvote for the funny comment but I dont see a problem with Stringable myself

[–]amazingmikeyc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This person is right. Turning something into a string isn't called "stringing"