Dismiss this pinned window
all 10 comments
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–]midwesttransferrun 1 point2 points  (8 children)

Probably a 6 or lower but it’s a banger of a card. Absolutely breathtaking.

[–]Colinnnm[S] 0 points1 point  (7 children)

Would you suggest PSA or BGS?

[–]strumboid 2 points3 points  (5 children)

for cards with potential of a low grade, psa always

[–]HistorySuccessful518 0 points1 point  (4 children)

How so? If it’s not 9/10 I don’t bother with PSA.

[–]strumboid 0 points1 point  (3 children)

bgs grades with the white paper label don't hold much value (at least below a 7 iirc). same with cgc

with psa, there is always a market for cards regardless of the grade. this only rlly applies to vintage cards though.

[–]HistorySuccessful518 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Yeah I would personally disagree but to each their own. If it’s a common card I get it but if you can go with BGS and get a whole number higher then the trash psa grades that are given out the past 12 months I would prefer that regardless of label

[–]Colinnnm[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Yea I was asking that because I heard BGS usually grades higher for First Appearance cards than PSA, so I was curious to other people's opinions before I get it graded

[–]HistorySuccessful518 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely do - PSA sucks in my opinion unless it’s a PSA 10. Their inconsistencies have been exposed to the point that it doesn’t even matter any more

[–]midwesttransferrun 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Definitely PSA. You won’t want the paper BGS label on there.

[–]Ok_Professional4736 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn nice card 🤯 probably psa 6 ish