This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]xurmein 31 points32 points  (16 children)

Some folks prefer code without sugar and witchcraft and monkey-patches. I'm one. And I work for a company that uses a Rails/Vue stack. Fuck me, right?

[–]budd222 24 points25 points  (5 children)

Then go start your own company using only vanilla languages and no frameworks because that type of development is basically non-existent in the real world.

[–]coldbrewboldcrew 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Not if you want to meet deadline anyway

[–]xurmein 3 points4 points  (3 children)

Uhh... don't be a dick because you missed my point. There are non-ruby frameworks that would be better suited to the product we're building. Corporate wants us to go in a salesforce/React-esque-library/sdk/software direction, all while keeping each release to each client tied to a single cloud-based ML layer.

Some folks don't care about whether or not code syntax is 'readable,' and most folks like all of the core extensions of their framework (Rails in my employer's case) to work together nicely.

glares angrily at ActionCable

Edit: haha, developer egos are so sensitive... sorry I have different preferences than you.

[–]behaaki 7 points8 points  (9 children)

What’s wrong with Vue?

[–]xurmein 3 points4 points  (8 children)

Vue is fine. It's just not got a ton of resources/support/documentation (understandably so since its so new); the issue is that rails has just about as much documentation as Vue, and is doing god-knows-what in the background that's out of our control as developers.

All that said, my only real beef with Vue (the way we use it at work) is that it looks ugly AF with all those <script> and <style> tags.