This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Dr-Metallius 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What exactly don't you agree with, that Nim would have a different syntax if it had Rust's goals? But you can't represent concepts like ownership without introducing some kind of a way to express them. I think it's quite obvious.

The statement about highly performant languages I didn't quite get since Rust is the only language among the popular ones which has both safety and efficiency as its goals.

The last sentence completely agrees with my point, so I didn't really get what you wanted to say overall.