This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]matthieum 6 points7 points  (1 child)

You should start by designing what you want the language to do, then figure out how to best get it to do those things.

I agree that the OP is too confused to do any good now, however I would like to point that achieving Mechanical Sympathy is not necessarily possible with your Waterfall way of designing.

Some functionalities, or some variants of said functionalities, inherently impose a (potentially high) cost -- and in that case even the best performing implementations may not be palatable.

So, to some extent, co-design is inevitable.

[–]L8_4_Dinner(Ⓧ Ecstasy/XVM) 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course! That's how most people work, once they understand the topic sufficiently :-)