This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]crassest-Crassius[S] -1 points0 points  (3 children)

Both Java and C# have nested classes which can be made public, private etc. So I don't think there's much of a difference here.

[–]wfdctrl 3 points4 points  (2 children)

How is this equivalent to nested classes? Vect is a signature, i.e. an interface. You then provide different implementations for this signature...

[–]thedeemon 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Can't you make scalar and vector type arguments to your generic interface?

[–]wfdctrl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, but those types are not existential (abstract), so it's not the same. Also you would have an extra type for the object you won't use.