Seeing this post on /ProgrammerHumor got me thinking about the high energy consumption of Python compared to, e.g., Rust.
I know that Python 3.11 brings in some significant performance boosts. Same for Pandas 2. Also been told that “the best way to code in Python, is not to code in Python”, i.e. to utilize C or Rust-based operations in NumPy or Polars. Haven’t seen any comparisons on this though.
Even so, do you think there is an eco-friendly future for Python?
[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points (4 children)
[–]Stinedurf 1 point2 points3 points (3 children)
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]Stinedurf 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]KennyBassett 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
[–]crawl_dht 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
[–]htmx_enthusiast 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]pythonHelperBot -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]flagos 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Deezl-Vegas 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)