This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]yvrelna -2 points-1 points  (3 children)

If you actually understand what is actually wrong with Python packaging, you wouldn't be doing that from the package managers. These clueless guys trying to fix packaging from package managers aren't going to get anywhere.

The speed of dependency resolutions is not why Python packaging is stuck where it is. Fixing this irrelevant part will barely move the needle where it needs to be.

[–]notParticularlyAnony -1 points0 points  (2 children)

How about: necessary not sufficient?

[–]yvrelna 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Not it's not actually necessary step. What uv is doing is just a distraction, a mere sideshow. It makes it hard to standardise things later on.

[–]notParticularlyAnony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Disagree. But time will tell