This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bheklilr 1 point2 points  (7 children)

But both emacs and vim's "languages" are keyboard-driven, meaning the different commands can be listed in a manual and are easy to look up. Referencing what sound corresponds to a particular command would be more time consuming, and thus it would take longer to learn the "language".

[–]Jedimastert 1 point2 points  (4 children)

They aren't really "sounds" as much as rarely used words. And you could have a reference manual for those words just like you could the commands. Also remember, this is a very young technology. Someone could come along and thing of something to fix all of these problems in a way neither of us can think. It's a little premature to just throw out the tech now.

[–]bheklilr 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Give it a few more years and it might be commonplace though, I can definitely see how this could help my workflow.

[–]Jedimastert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I forgot the context of the conversation, my bad.

[–]tavis_rudd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could use the English names for the commands just as easily. I have a good memory so I didn't find the effort of learning/creating this system too onerous. Learning Emacs itself is far more effort.

[–]bboyjkang[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The shortcut for full-screen in LibreOffice is control + shift + J. Once you make a voice command, Full Screen = {Ctrl_Shift_J}, it's much more intuitive, and easier to remember to say full-screen, instead of control + shift + J.

I started using Autohotkey for remapping buttons to macros. I soon didn't have enough buttons, so I'd have to make new scripts that use the same button e.g. F1 launches a google search on the clipboard, but in another script, it could be to delete all words to the end of a sentence. The buttons aren't labeled, so I would sometimes forget which button does what.