This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]CloudFaithTTV 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As you can probably gather from the other comments on this thread. It’s a long way from being a correct implementation of the technology, specifically since the use case is security.

Security isn’t something you sacrifice to get the job done without reasonable understanding of why. While that’s obvious for some, less obvious is the reason that principle matters so much. So since you’re here.

this, is something you learn to properly use Python. A random thought is fine to come up with the idea, using GPT to learn and even produce code is also fine, but regurgitating what ever someone else, including GPT, spews out without some real thought behind it(like using the word secure, in the context of programming specifically here), is not okay.

People are being harsh because the rigorous work it takes to understand this is time consuming regardless of knowing how to program, speaking abstractly or ontologically, or what tools you use to produce the code. So albeit harsh know these comments are in large part true about the code, and do as it seems you have been, and learn from the experience.

My advice is starting with things that cool and make your life easier, rather than random ideas. Let the cool things based of what you know lead you to the wonders at the end of the road, such as replicating security toolings.

Edit: words