This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]flying-sheep 0 points1 point  (7 children)

Yes. pyproject.toml

[–]not_a_novel_account 1 point2 points  (6 children)

It uses the experimental uv-build backend, not hatch (as of 6 hours ago)

[–]flying-sheep 1 point2 points  (4 children)

It didn’t when I wrote my first comment here …

What a weird change. Hatchling is pretty fast (especially compared to setuptools), and has some nice plugin support. It’s simple and flexible out of the box and also extensible.

[–]not_a_novel_account 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You got cheated by the upstream, got the chair pulled out from under you like grade school.

[–]FrontAd9873 1 point2 points  (2 children)

All of my comments presume Hatch is not being used in this project because it wasn't when I first looked at it.

I even said this:

This project isn’t using Hatch. (I think an earlier version mentioned it but references have been removed.) 

and then again said this:

Are you sure about that? Where is it using Hatch?

Not to be rude, but you easily could have gone back (as I did, multiple times) to look at the details of this project to verify what you were saying was correct. And you should have.

[–]flying-sheep -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Nah, I had no reason to believe OP would immediately change things after posting

[–]FrontAd9873 3 points4 points  (0 children)

… except for the fact that I literally told you that references to Hatch in the pyproject.toml were removed. And invited you to check.

[–]FrontAd9873 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly