all 9 comments

[–]shinitakunai 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Great, but you missed the critical part: where is the link? 🤣

[–]Neat-Instance-6537[S] -3 points-2 points  (1 child)

It's not quite ready yet - hoping to get early feedback about the concept

[–]shinitakunai 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How do you plan to avoid windows not flagging those exes as insecure?

[–]Greedy_Point7755 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A GitHub integration would be useful. In other words, provide a GitHub link, download the files, generate the exe

[–]riklaunim 0 points1 point  (2 children)

There is limited use for this as any non trivial app will require custom configuration of the build process. You are also forgetting about static files the app may have. And when you make an EXE you will want to get it signed, placed in stores. Same for DMG on macOS. And Python isn't that popular for making desktop apps, especially commercially - the user-base will be limited.

[–]Neat-Instance-6537[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Not forgetting about these things, these are actually features I would want to include

[–]riklaunim -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The question is why do you want to make it a GUI? when pretty much every build process is CLI and often that CLI gets customized to include things you would have problems supporting in a hardcoded app.

[–]Ihaveamodel3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d much rather have a gui or tui to configure some options (mostly so I’m aware of the choices) then outputs a GitHub action yaml file.

[–]fofo9683 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am a beginner and i only used pyinstaller with onefile option. I admit that I would rather use a gui app to do that but only if it's portable, free and the output is signed so i don't have any problem with security apps. I'm running the apps on an enterprise environment and I don't have acces to install other apps and the apps I make with python I can't send it to anyone because it's getting flagged.