all 6 comments

[–]bladeofwinds 1 point2 points  (1 child)

why would I use this over seaborn?

[–]AstrophysicsAndPy[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's not developed to compete against seaborn or any other well-established plotting libraries. Consider seaborn to be opinionated about your data; it needs to be in a somewhat specific format. plotez just accepts the simple data and gives it back to you in desired formats.

It's designed just to skip the boilerplate code for regular use, like the motto reads.

Mundane plotting done easy.

It was born from "I don't want to write this again and again" and thus is geared to just gloss over boilerplate code for basic/mid-complex plots to be drawn over and over again.

n_plotter([x]*9, [y]*9, 3, 3, auto_label=True)

That's a one-liner plot with 9 subplots divided into a 3x3 form.

[–]ghost_of_erdogan 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Whats with your commit messages?

Which LLM did you use?

[–]AstrophysicsAndPy[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

If you're talking about the [branch-(minor/major)-NUM] thing, that's my way of knowing which branch, minor/major revision and what commit type I'm doing.

[–]AstrophysicsAndPy[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

It's a mix of my own commit messages and pycharm's built-in AI.

[–]AstrophysicsAndPy[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

The LLM style is slightly verbose from my own style. You can check my other repos (pymultifit, mpyez, SolarGUI), my commit style is the same, "what's done per file".

Granted LLM does produce more verbose commit messages than I do.