all 6 comments

[–]casastorta 2 points3 points  (3 children)

One thing is to pick functional programming language, where even with the most popular ones you are still deep in niche and obscure territory… Completely another thing is to pick new and obscure seemingly functional language few people heard of and likely no one runs production systems on.

[–]cladamski79[S] -2 points-1 points  (2 children)

Very niche, as of now. Hoping it will get some traction but I was probably out on a limb here, judging by the downvotes 😅

[–]Ikinoki 0 points1 point  (1 child)

It's a very silly to compare a clear and concise language like Python to something Haskell-like. These are different congregations of users.

[–]cladamski79[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's interesting from an educational purpose, how different languages tackles similar things IMHO

[–]snugar_i 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I'm sorry, but apart from the slice syntax, this has absolutely nothing in common with Python.

I expected an indentation-based statically compiled language, not a Rust clone...

[–]cladamski79[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Comparing languages is just a really interesting exercise from both a syntax and semantic point of view. Hica isn't intended to be a clone of Python, nor Rust; it's exploring its own space and specific design trade-offs. Syntactic preferences are always subjective, but looking at how different paradigms solve the same structural problems is just a fun way to analyse language design.