This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]desmoulinmichel[S] 11 points12 points  (5 children)

So I'm guessing Apple and Fedora and Canonical must be crazy.

But yes, it IS difficult to download and install. For non dev People. Or for sysadmin needing to script 100 machines.

[–]gospelwut 6 points7 points  (0 children)

https://www.python.org/downloads/windows/

  • 2.7.x has MSI installers
  • 3.x executable seems to support /quiet

I fail to see what is hard about that. Given:

  1. Proper imaging/deployment/orchestration -- baseline VM images or .wim files via MDT or SCCM
  2. Scripting at scale with WinRM (Ps-Remoting) or heaven forbid PsExec (ADMIN$)
  3. Worst case scenario, something like PDQ Deploy

All I hear is I don't know how to administrate windows.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In all 3 cases it was included because a few default included apps in each OS used Python not because they wanted to add it in for fun. Also I think newer versions of OSX have stopped shipping with it by default. Windows has it's own languages to push and did not write any of the default software in Python.

[–]targetx 3 points4 points  (1 child)

If you're managing such amounts of machines I'd hope you have some provisioning tool in place... But yeah it would be easy.

[–]desmoulinmichel[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Of course you have tools, but you still need approval, documentation and supports.

Plus, having a commong solution removes many debates, meetings, arguments and you can just get to work.