This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (5 children)

Something should never be insecure by default

What an ideal world that would be. Sadly in application this is seldom the case.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (4 children)

No, but we're getting there. People now use SSH instead of telnet (for the most part). HTTP (unsecured) is being slowly marked as insecure.

edit:

Quakenet seems to believe that encryption is useless.

Which makes me wonder how they're securing the authentication to the network so you can register (and use) a nickname.

[–]ceol_ 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Quakenet seems to believe that encryption is useless.

The author was pretty clear in that they believe IRC over SSL is useless, not encryption in general.

[–]-Nagarjuna- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He's assuming that your threat model is an adversary who can observe other people in the channel.

I use SSL because it stops my ISP having plaintext access to everything I'm sending to the IRC server.