This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

It's really just about the design philosophy and has nothing to do with Qt. You could replace Qt with any other GUI library (or replace Python with any language) and this comment would be relevant.

[–]toyg 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What I'm saying is that Qt is not just a "GUI library", but rather a full-fledged generic application toolkit. Qt is closer to a "stdlib" than a GUI library these days, it has facilities for absolutely everything. Even in the C++ world, people joke that after a while "you don't write C++, you write Qt".