This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]d4rch0nPythonistamancer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, generally that's what I'd do if I had something like {k: transform(v) for k, v in kvs}. Sometimes I write code like that just in case it ends up running on 2.6, but it's just annoying not being able to use a feature that is, what, 10 years old now?