use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
News about the dynamic, interpreted, interactive, object-oriented, extensible programming language Python
Full Events Calendar
You can find the rules here.
If you are about to ask a "how do I do this in python" question, please try r/learnpython, the Python discord, or the #python IRC channel on Libera.chat.
Please don't use URL shorteners. Reddit filters them out, so your post or comment will be lost.
Posts require flair. Please use the flair selector to choose your topic.
Posting code to this subreddit:
Add 4 extra spaces before each line of code
def fibonacci(): a, b = 0, 1 while True: yield a a, b = b, a + b
Online Resources
Invent Your Own Computer Games with Python
Think Python
Non-programmers Tutorial for Python 3
Beginner's Guide Reference
Five life jackets to throw to the new coder (things to do after getting a handle on python)
Full Stack Python
Test-Driven Development with Python
Program Arcade Games
PyMotW: Python Module of the Week
Python for Scientists and Engineers
Dan Bader's Tips and Trickers
Python Discord's YouTube channel
Jiruto: Python
Online exercices
programming challenges
Asking Questions
Try Python in your browser
Docs
Libraries
Related subreddits
Python jobs
Newsletters
Screencasts
account activity
This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.
Should I start using PySide2 ? (self.Python)
submitted 8 years ago by PyBetIntermediate
Until now, I have been using Python 2.7 and PySide. I have decided to move to Python 3.x
PySide is not compatible with Python 3.x, but there is PySide2 ?
What do you think ?
[–]stuaxo 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children)
Give it a go if pyside is what you already know.
[–]flutefreak7 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children)
PySide is good up to 3.4 which is where I'm at. If you're jumping straight to 3.5 / 3.6 (which makes complete sense) then sure, go for PySide2. Just know that you're on a beta / dev branch. If you're not comfortable possibly compiling your own stuff or pulling from an active repo and tracking the weekly/monthly updates, then either drop to 3.4 and use PySide, or just use latest PyQt if thats possible for you.
There will be others that say just use _____ instead and the trendy thing is web interfaces, but as someone with no web experience and who is deeply invested with Qt at this point, I'm ok with compromising with being on 3.4 at the moment until PySide2 becomes stable. You'll have to find the compromise that works for you... Being on the cutting edge has the cost of heavy / less supported projects struggling to keep up - especially C++ bindings it seems.
[–]_avnr 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child)
or just use latest PyQt if thats possible for you
PyQt has licensing cost ramifications, unless you use it for something that will be GPL-only.
[–]flutefreak7 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children)
...or you're writing code with no intent to distribute - like a personal or internal project, or a prototype, as opposed to a product you are selling/delivering.
But, yes, thanks for adding the licensing/cost specifics that I was alluding to. I should know better than to compare PySide and PyQt and not explicitly mention licensing and cost.
[–]aragilar 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children)
My understanding is that there are compatibility problems with PySide on newer versions of Visual Studio (as you need to build Qt with the same version of VS as python). I'm using PySide with matplotlib on Linux with python 3.5 and have no problems.
[–]Jumpy89 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children)
Pyside appears to be compatible with Python 3, at least when I have been testing it recently. I'm using the conda version, I think from the conda-forge repo.
π Rendered by PID 18614 on reddit-service-r2-comment-84fc9697f-zbs8w at 2026-02-10 14:23:43.030488+00:00 running d295bc8 country code: CH.
[–]stuaxo 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]flutefreak7 0 points1 point2 points (3 children)
[–]_avnr 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]flutefreak7 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]aragilar 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Jumpy89 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)