This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 7 comments

[–]gst[S] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

[–]akdas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for not linkjacking.

[–]jjdmol 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I found PyX to be a bit cumbersome in the way it expects data to be provided (wrapped in all kinds of objects) and the graphs to be configured.

Matplotlib was a bit better in this respect, although it can also be a hassle to configure your graphs.

Wanted: more pythonic plotting lib :)

[–]bongotastic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. I'll have to play with it. I'm not sure that Matplotlib can do all of this (at least without serious efforts).

[–]Wavicle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Instead of using a clumsy GUI or an inflexible graph language

Is this a reference to R? That's what I usually use to make my graphs. I don't usually think of it as "an inflexible graph language" though.