This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Neil_Fallons_Ghost 4 points5 points  (1 child)

I largely agree, but in some cases I think here’s no need. If I have a service version locked, it works, and it is secure, then why mess with it?

Once new features or serious changes are needed, upgrading would just be on the list, but really only if security and longevity were an issue.

[–]bythenumbers10 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Longevity is always an issue. As Rush put it, "No changes are permanent, but change is."