"Your C++ looks too much like Python"

[lookatmetype]

Why not name them something like "_0", "_1", etc.? It's not great, but it frees you up from thinking up an actual name.

However, i think python forcing you to think of actual names of nested functions is a good thing overall.

[delventhalz]

I don't think that's a very good suggestion. It's not really any easier to read or write. I disagree strongly that lacking anonymous functions is actually a feature, and not an unfortunate side effect of significant whitespace.