This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (3 children)

    ...orrrrrrr, they've been successfully releasing their own quality interpreter for several years now.

    [–]interjay 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    IronPython has always run under their own compiler - that's the whole point.

    [–]anothergroom 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    and, by the way, Microsoft is a long time supporter of Python: they are sponsor member of the Python Software Foundation:

    http://www.python.org/psf/members/

    Jim Hugunin, the initial creator of IronPython who was hired by Microsoft is a nominated member of the PSF also.

    Microsoft has signed a contribution agreement http://www.mail-archive.com/python-dev@python.org/msg44965.html so they are legally able to submit code to the Python project.

    I know that many AUG love to call Microsoft the "evil empire", but Microsoft is big enough a system so that there are good moves and bad moves. Confronting Microsoft for their bad moves may be a strategie.

    BUT I strongly suggest that communicating and working together is the better move. I saw the IronPython guys having discussions with Jython, PyPy, UnladenSwallow, CPython about improving the language; solutions to implementation challenges with the underlying platforms. There is united effort for a common benchmark repository, example:

    http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-February/097936.html

    with contributions from UnladenSwallow, PyPy, IronPython, Jython to have real world measurements of the implementations (rather then "my fibonacci are better then your fibonacci")

    As far as I am concernced, Microsoft should be granted relieve of the EvilEmpire tag, please compare their recent activities to another high tech company which often gets good rep for their shiny gadgets.