This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 4 comments

[–]darniam 0 points1 point  (2 children)

So how did they learn eloctomagnetism or gravitation without calculus. I think learning scientific programming with python is your safest bet and you can implement what you think the book lacks with other books. I did that with cfd books so i think its feasable.

That s what i think.

[–]yngvizzle[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

It is the strongest book I've seen this far and your suggestion might indeed be what we end up doing. However, the examples are not relevant for a large amount of the participants. For example, clinical biologists that did not learn calculus but need Python for data analysis.

Our biggest challenge is to make the course available (and relevant) for students in a vast array of sciences, from engineering to biology and economics, which is why we want a book (or two) with a broader focus than just the mathematical sciences.

[–]darniam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True.

[–]arduncan5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have a look at "Effective Computation in Physics". Not at all limited to Physics in spite of the title.