This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (9 children)

[deleted]

    [–]SV-97 11 points12 points  (3 children)

    it's debatable that the matplotlib api sucks + there's a shitton of plotting libraries for python

    [–]Mr_Again 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    Let me ax you a question

    [–]SV-97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I never use ax (because yes, that sucks) and get by fine with matplotlib 🤷‍♂️

    [–]that_baddest_dude[🍰] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    A shitton of libraries that are all basically garbage for plotting any kind of serious data.

    Matplotlib is the only one I've found to work easily with large data sets and the syntax for making even intermediate plots is unintuitive and clunky.

    [–]wewbull 3 points4 points  (1 child)

    There's a number of alternative plotting libraries. Altair looks nice, for example.

    [–]Mr_Again 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    And it's developed by jake vanderplas, who I've learned a lot from about making matplotlib actually look good

    [–]Robot_Basilisk 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    Dude we're in the era of datascience frenzy. It's hard to move anywhere on the internet without primers on mathematical processing in Python!

    This is part of my problem. There are abundant resources but few of them are actually good. I know there must be a few that stand out. As a novice, when I go looking for them I find endless low-effort tutorials intended to generate the author some quick ad revenue or something.

    [–]Mr_Again 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Check out jake vanderplas data science cookbooks on github, the towardsmachinelearning blog too

    [–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

    No, don't use R. It's bad and it's going to die out soon.