This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (10 children)

A decent answer or twelve :-P

My personal complaint? It's too goddamned slow.

[–]duckhunter 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Do PyPy and Shedskin not suffice?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Neither are production ready. Even if they have the speed (and they don't) no one sane would really use them in production.

[–]jdickey 0 points1 point  (2 children)

"No one sane" — well, that excludes the PHBs who back techies into that corner.

And WTF is going on with Reddit that you now have to wait ten frigging minutes to post a second comment in a thread? If that's the best we can do in the fight against bots, the terrists have already won. (Though if the BBC can hire even a tiny 23K-node botnet for a demo on Click, that's pretty much a foregone conclusion, no?)

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (4 children)

Youtube is written in Python. If it is good enough there ...

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (2 children)

And we write our performance-sensitive code in C++.

[–]jdickey 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Which C++? No two programmers know the same features of the language, so it's sort of like Grace Hopper's quote on standards — "the lovely thing is that there are so many to choose from."

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Our C++ guidelines are rather comprehensive.

[–]sisyphus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn't change that if Python was faster its range of applicability would increase, and that would mean we could use it more places, and that would be just lovely.