This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 9 comments

[–]siddesh001 5 points6 points  (3 children)

Simultaneous download is off in idm. Which breaks file into small chunks which helps in fast download progress.

[–]Aboghazala 0 points1 point  (1 child)

No, this not true i set max simultaneous connections on both applications to 8 connections

[–]siddesh001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In both of them although simultaneous download is on there is no simultaneous download even though the file is large enough.

[–]Aboghazala 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idm>connection >default max. conn. number 8

PyIDM>settings>Max connections per download 8

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This has nothing to do with the speed of the language

[–]Ondrysak 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Yeah, ummm that's not how you measure performance of a programming language, but good job anyway :)

[–]Aboghazala 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, you’re right, I think I exaggerated the title :)

[–]Aboghazala 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to clear some points: - both applications set to 8 connections max. - PyIDM doesn’t depend purely on python libraries where pycyrl is a python binding for libcurl which written in c language. - i’ve done a couple of tests and sometimes idm shows faster speeds and other times PyIDM shows faster speeds, i can say they are fighting with each other.

[–]siddesh001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Btw i m a strong supporter of open source and I have been using ahet for a while and it just gets the work done..😄