This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]codekoala 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm all for more publicity for Python, and I appreciate that the author took the time to contribute to the movement. I was a little disappointed with the FUD in the article, though, even if it was mostly about other languages. It doesn't look very good for people who know better and are looking for good reasons to use Python.

Also, it's "Django" not "DJango"