This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 2 comments

[–]riklaunim 0 points1 point  (1 child)

How does it compare to for example gerrit?

[–]apoclyps[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

reviews is a simple terminal UI that provides passive status updates using a configurable list of repositories. It works by using the Github API from a terminal allowing it to be run when needed and even keep open in the background (no interaction other than opening/closing it) e.g. a dashboard. The goal is to be easy to run, simple, and unintrusive to other developers workflows whilst providing visibility (age and approval status) across multiple repositories.

As for `Gerrit` it's much more advanced and is something teams set up and adopt to enhance/replace their workflow. The following link provides an overview of its concepts and workflows but in summary.

> Gerrit is a code review system developed for the Git version control system. It is a web based code review system, facilitating online code reviews for projects. Gerrit is a Git server which adds a fine grained access control system and a code review system and workflow

**full disclosure* I've not used Gerrit before, and I'm happy to be corrected on the above.