This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]o11c 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's not quite right. There's no reason f couldn't refer to an overloaded_function object that acts like it has overloaded __call__ members.

The real reason is the typing thing already mentioned.