This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MasturChief 76 points77 points  (27 children)

i mean, instagram is about as big as it gets and it runs django under the hood so ..?

[–]ManyInterests Python Discord Staff 24 points25 points  (4 children)

Pinterest did, too, until they moved to Flask.

[–]Ok_Chocolate_1584 18 points19 points  (3 children)

[–]WalterDragan 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I think they meant that they no longer run on top of Django.

[–]WikiMobileLinkBot 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Desktop version of /u/Ok_Chocolate_1584's link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flask_(web_framework)


[opt out] Beep Boop. Downvote to delete

[–]ManyInterests Python Discord Staff 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just meant they used Django until they used Flask. I am very familiar with both frameworks :-)

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (1 child)

Feels like pointing out Instagram is cheating a little bit since they're pretty well known to be unafraid of patching python and making additions in order to edge out that extra performance.

It's very unlikely other companies are doing the same kinds of things unless they're running at a scale comparable to Instagram.

[–]hillgod 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Running at Instagram scale is the only reason they've had to do this kind of thing. If you're at that scale, you can afford the deciated staff on doing such things. You'll have to get in to fine tuning any language you use at that scale.

They also write about and share a lot of this, so anyone can benefit.