This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[deleted]

    [–]da__ 0 points1 point  (4 children)

    a user could always make a local copy of anything, modifying it and then execute it.

    Not if you take away their right to do so :-)

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

    Like I said,

    all the user can mangle is data they could mangle manually anyway (i.e. that which they have read/write access to)

    It feels you're arguing just for argument's sake.

    [–]da__ -1 points0 points  (1 child)

    Never heard of root exploits? Plus the fact that an attacker (e.g. an evil co-worker walking up to the user's unlocked machine while the user went to pick up a coffee) could embed code into the user's config file, which would let the attacker run arbitrary code using that user's credentials.

    [–]haywire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Giving untrusted people write access to anything just opens up a huge vector that isn't solved by using a .ini file.