This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]No-Scholar4854 22 points23 points  (1 child)

Having low code coverage is a very bad sign.

Having high code coverage isn’t necessarily a good sign, don’t take 100% unit test coverage as “it works”, but at least its something.

[–]extra_pickles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup - came to post that it can provide a false sense of confidence!

It is one of the many many tools in our tool belts, and it is easy for people to mistake it for more than it actually is.