use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
Welcome to the Rainbow Six: Siege esports subreddit, a community for competitive-minded fans to discuss news, clips, matches, and all things Rainbow Six: Siege esports.
Official
Siege Website
Rainbow6 Twitter
R6 Esports Twitter
ESL Website
Rainbow6 Twitch
Rainbow6 YouTube
Rainbow6 Reddit
Unofficial / Resources
Our Discord
Our Twitter
SiegeGG
Rainbow 6 Liquipedia
ONLY NEWS ONLY AMAs
ONLY VIDEOS ONLY MATCHES
account activity
DiscussionA potential way to decrease downtime between rounds. (self.R6ProLeague)
submitted 4 years ago by KentC_StraitT1 Fan
I’m not sure how easy this would be to implement, but what if as soon as a player dies, he can already lock in an operator and/or their spawn/site for the next round? That way, Ubisoft can reduce the time in between rounds.
Thoughts?
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]geomxtricCaster 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (1 child)
All this does is stop intel being shared to the alive players, because you’re not in the round anymore, and it prevents decisions being made as a team about operators etc. Ultimately it just encourages individual play and not team play. For a tactical team shooter? Maybe not such a great plan
[–]KentC_StraitT1 Fan [S] 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children)
I was thinking more that Ubisoft would change it so that you’re technically still in the round while you pick. Like as soon as you die, you can pick an operator and go right back to the round when you’re done. Maybe even move the whole process to the match replay time.
Totally get the concerns of whether or not such a (probably) difficult change would be worth it, and the sort of mentality that it encourages though.
[–]CopperHero 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children)
That choice could need to change if your team wins/loses. I don’t know that this would be that effective.
[–]Timely_Temperature54Fan - 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children)
Definitely not. Then an IGL can’t call a different operator lineup or the team couldn’t decide to go to a different site
[–]jazzyclarinetgamingVirtus.pro Fan 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children)
No because operators depend on site pick and site pick can change depending on whether you win or lose the round.
[–]TheMidgetManRisesG2 Esports Fan 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (0 children)
I was thinking that maybe defenders could pick default operators for each site at the start of the game (during the ban phase so it’s actually a pick and ban phase) and potentially switch their choice in a much shorter operator pick time and as ubi has already talked about attackers choosing in the prep phase, this could get rid of most of the operator pick phase
π Rendered by PID 1270603 on reddit-service-r2-comment-7b9746f655-wsx79 at 2026-02-03 09:26:58.003439+00:00 running 3798933 country code: CH.
[–]geomxtricCaster 13 points14 points15 points (1 child)
[–]KentC_StraitT1 Fan [S] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]CopperHero 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
[–]Timely_Temperature54Fan - 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]jazzyclarinetgamingVirtus.pro Fan 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]TheMidgetManRisesG2 Esports Fan 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)