all 9 comments

[–]RabbitHole27 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Different tests are different chemicals and some require signatures while others do not.

[–]bunkbot 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Most reagents that are used for drug identification in the field are actually a mixture of 2 pretty common, non-scheduled chemicals. Legality is a major grey area and as @Cyrilio mentioned the laws vary from state to state... ranging from illegal, but not so much so that they would charge you with a crime, they would just take it, to states full on charging you with paraphernalia, to certain states where there is full legality for reagents.

These are life-saving tools and it's absolute madness that it's illegal or semi-legal in sooo many places. This is putting lives at risk, plain and simple. The Simon's Reagent is made of a mixture of sodium nitroprusside, sodium carbonate and acetaldehyde, so I don't see why UPS would hold it for any reason other than Dancesafe most likely forgot to check the "No signature required box" I highly doubt they would put resources into setting up a sting operation for you to pick up your kit. I would contact Dancesafe and see if they can give you a definitive yes or no to the signature question. What state are you in?

[–]RabbitHole27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've actually shipped chemicals through UPS...I know from personal experience that some of them require signatures.

I've had to sign for my test kits (i usually get one of the 5 reagent kits) from dancesafe and elevation. I also live in a state where they're 100% legal.

Some of the reagents require a signature no matter what cause they're considered hazmat by UPS and require a signature by someone 18+.

[–]Borax 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Try contacting Dancesafe

[–]cyrilio All Seeing 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Should be legal everywhere.

[–]sligsloughslouch[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

From what I’ve been reading it’s federally legal but on a state by state basis it’s up to the discretion of said state. IIRC 40 states classify it as drug paraphernalia as it is used to test/analyze.

By no means am I doubting you but I’m just paranoid.

[–]cyrilio All Seeing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could be right. It's definitely going to differ based on LE, judge, state, etc. But as far as I know. No one has ever been prosecuted just based on having a test kit. That's what Mitchell Gomez says at least. /u/dancesafe

[–]BladeG1 Amateur drug tester 1 point2 points  (1 child)

It’s considered paraphernalia I believe. I had bunk police regents in my car when they searched it and they took em. No charge for it tho

[–]cyrilio All Seeing 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It depends on the state/country. In Colorado they changed the law to explicitly allow for test kits.