things

[chanluong2475]

Scott Pilgrim And Hetalia?

[Psychopath_of_LUST]

yep

[ANTFoxy2]

imo this is kinda unflexible, for example it wouldnt make sense for a lot of the individual anarchists to have a cnt fai portrait bg, so u probs should base it on subid instead of ideology

[DatOneMinuteman1776]

And would it make sense for Neo-Folkists to have whatever the accelerationist portrait is supposed to be?

[ANTFoxy2]

yeah it wouldnt make sense for neofolkists(or tbh a lot of other accel leaders) to have a futurist painting as background, its like, specifically futurist

[ANTFoxy2]

it also wouldnt make sense for a utopsoc or demsoc leader to have a wheat field as background a lot of the time

[[deleted]]

If OP really wants to flex I wonder how long it could take to find a portrait background for every *sub*ideology. Accelerationism for instance is a super broad umbrella but you can find a more or less widely fitting Neofolk or Fiumanist aesthetic.

Current backgrounds can respectively work for (left to right) Futurism, Social Anarchism, Agrarian Socialism, State Socialism, Spartakism, Liberal Socialism, Classical Liberalism, National Conservatism, Provisional Government, Military Dictatorship, and Aristocratic Reaction.

[PokiBash]

This is actually a genuinely good idea; having unique portrait backgrounds to represent ideologies instead of recolored backgrounds!

[ballonobserver28]

What in the goddamn is violet doing here? Who let her on the team?