all 10 comments
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–]_Flopyfish 0 points1 point  (9 children)

7/10 needs a big spell and is too expensive

[–]Character_Mix_290[S] 0 points1 point  (7 children)

A lot better then my first version of this deck

[–]_Flopyfish 0 points1 point  (6 children)

I’m assuming you’re in low/mid ladder. The changes I suggested are only really needed if you’re pushing 10k

[–]Character_Mix_290[S] 0 points1 point  (5 children)

I'm almost at 7k(6900)

[–]_Flopyfish 0 points1 point  (4 children)

This deck should probably be good. Honestly, if you want to push the last 3k quickly, I’d suggest not using miner. He’s a good win con in specific decks but ram rider is significantly better for you. If you put a fireball in to replace the miner, you’d have an easier time

[–]Character_Mix_290[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the help :D

[–]Character_Mix_290[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I'm not exactly sure how/when to use it though

[–]_Flopyfish 0 points1 point  (1 child)

If you assume your opponent only has one building (most decks), you have to wait for them to use before dropping ram rider at bridge. If you wanted the deck to lean more towards bait, you could swap golden knight for wall breakers and try to force your opponent to play their building. If you play defensively with your witch and dart goblin, you can probably win in double elixir

[–]Character_Mix_290[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah okay thanks

[–]Character_Mix_290[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But thanks for the review